Everyone agrees that
children should receive the best education
possible to prepare the next generation for
life. There is less agreement, however,
about the most effective way to provide that
education and when to start the formal
process. Across the United States, the
compulsory age to begin school varies from 5
to 8.
Parents in states
with a higher starting age have more
flexibility in determining whether their
children are truly ready for formal
education. The Home School Legal Defense
Association believes parents are in the best
position to judge their children's
readiness. There has, however, been a push
to lower the compulsory attendance age or
mandate preschool. In 2002, a bill was
defeated in the D.C. Council that would have
made preschool mandatory for all children as
young as 3 years old.
The theory advanced
by mandatory-preschool advocates is that
children need to be exposed to formal
education early or they will fall behind and
become societal burdens. Is this true? Does
forcing 3-year-olds into formal education
improve their educational attainment?
Contrary to what we
hear when states push to get children in
school earlier, research suggests that
preschool children suffer from various
aliments when they are exposed to early
formal education. This is not the fault of
teachers but the simple reality that
preschoolers' minds are not ready to master
the skills they need for structured
education. It's just too soon.
For example,
psychologist and professor of child
development David Elkind discovered in his
2001 study "Much Too Early" that the
capacity to manipulate symbols mentally is
developed around age 5 or 6. This makes it
possible for children to attain a level of
achievement in math or reading, for
instance, that is not possible for preschool
children. Furthermore, a report by the
Southwest Policy Institute says, "Contrary
to common belief, early institutional
schooling can harm children emotionally,
intellectually and socially."
Children are
dependent on their parents for their care.
If a child is deprived of the parental bond
early in life, his or her natural
development is disrupted.
It is impossible to
predict the exact long-term outcomes of
severing the bond between parent and child,
but the experience of Czechoslovakia under
Soviet oppression gives some insight.
Clinical psychologist
David A. Scott reported in a talk called
"Day Care and Democracy in Eastern Europe"
that "[i]nstitutionalized children ...
suffered developmental retardation and
deprivation. In comparison with children
raised in families, the institutionalized
children suffered heightened emotional
disorders, fear, tension, behavioral
disorders."
Recent media reports
stemming from a Yale University study have
shown that preschoolers are being expelled
from their school programs in
ever-increasing numbers. In response, many
commentators have used the Yale study as an
excuse to ask for more money. However, could
it be that many children are responding
negatively because they are separated from
their parents and not ready for this
heightened social interaction?
In the drive to
ensure that our children receive the best
education, we are in danger of over
institutionalizing them. A child will
develop naturally if the parents give the
child what he or she needs most in the
formative years -- plenty of love and
attention. In this way, the brain can
develop freely, and when the child is ready,
he or she can begin formal schooling.
The best
early-childhood education is in the home.
Children's educational, emotional and
psychological needs can be provided by their
parents in a safe home environment where the
children can pursue their own interests
without distractions. Then home education
could become the natural outworking of the
preschool years.
As the debate over
mandatory preschool continues, it's time to
take a closer look at the dangers of
preschool. Evidence shows that young
children are better off at home. Spending
vast sums of money to force children into
preschool could harm large numbers of
children who would carry the scars of their
preschool experience into their later school
years. This is not in the best interest of
children.
Educating the next
generation is crucial. We cannot afford to
experiment with new systems, especially when
the evidence shows that there are problems
with the new methods. Additionally, all
efforts should be made to try to make the
current schools successful before bringing
even younger children into the school
environment. Supporting what we know works
and allowing parents to freely choose is the
wisest course of action for a child's early
education.